When the news came out that Newsweek had listed Finland as the best country in the world, it was all over the Finnish press and TV news coverage.

It also made that particular copy of Newsweek a hot seller in Finland as my wife found out when she tried to buy a copy to read and then send to a Finnish friend of hers in the US. (All copies were sold out here).

It was lucky that she didn't find a copy as that friend it turns out subscribes to Newsweek and she sent (unsolicited) a copy of it to us which has just arrived.

What this set of articles more than anything else indicate to me is (once again) just how fixated US Americans are with their own country.

The entire set of countries covered are listed it is true in a long list (lower half of the double page) almost at the beginning of the section on this (and the United States came eleventh by the way), yet moving on and the three lists of "the ten best" located prominently at the top of the next two pages all have the United States in either second or first place.

In order to placate their US readers who expect the US to be best in everything, they have created a few sub-groups the key one of which is "Among populous nations".

So the first prominently located list of ten is "Quality of Life" where the US probably actually came more like twentieth but in "among populous nations" it is second. Well worth making highly visible then.

But if you thought that was calculating, what about the next two tables then? BOTH are for "Economic Dynamism". There the US did so well (the first table is for all the countries in the survey and the US came second) that a single table on this isn't enough. Instead there is the first table of all the countries already mentioned *and* a second table of the same Economic Dynamism topic but this time "among populous nations" where as Singapore is no longer included the US now comes first!

Mission Accomplished. The US is best and the writers can move on to a couple of pages where the US doesn't even come in the top ten in anything (two of the four being tables for all countries).

But all stories should have a happy ending and Newsweek do not disappoint their US readers. The final page has a single table at the top of the page "Overall Ranking" where the US is second. Of course there in small print are the words "among populous countries" again but then that small print is hardly noticeable. The US triumphs again ...

P.S. There were two sections in the survey (Education and Health) that didn't have an "Among Populous Nations" table printed in the article. What's the betting the US didn't do very well in those sections?

P.P.S. (later) The P.S. was right. This Blog http://bimvp.com/blogs/bsm/archive/2010/09/01/the-world-s-best-countries-great-interactive-infographic.aspx gives a graph of the US positions in all five categories. In both the Education and Health categories, the US was 26th out of 100.

People living in Finland will be aware that we have had a long-running saga about whether two grandmothers should be sent back to where they came from.

Both - a Russian (of 80+) and an Egyptian (of only 60+ despite the sob-enducing grandmother label) came to join one of their offspring in Finland.

Unfortunately for them although Finnish law allows for "central" family members to join immigrant members of their family in Finland, this "central" concept includes an unrestricted number of children (and parents of underage children who came to Finland by themselves and then applied to stay) but not mothers of grown-ups.

The Russian grandmother is about to be moved to a modern Finnish-built and Finnish-supported old people's home south of St. Petersburg and the part of the cost of her stay there that is more than three-quarters of her pension will be paid by the Russian authorities in St. Petersburg after they got involved in the issue following Russian press reports.

It's the Egyptian who has caused me to find sick humour in the situation.

Despite the son saying that he is prepared to commit to paying all her costs in Finland, it was finally announced that she would be sent back last Monday.

The son knew of this and so we had - for me - the somewhat humourous statement from him to all the Finnish press that he would not answer his phone so that the Finnish police wouldn't be able to contact him to arrange the picking up for deportation.

This seemed to be a case of an ostrich sticking its head in the sand because then no-one would see it.

However this piece was bettered a couple of days later when the time came for the police to collect the grandmother. The police couldn't find the woman and the reason they gave to the papers the next day was that they had rung all the telephone numbers they had for the son and couldn't get in contact with him. So they would have to think of some other method.

Don't they read the papers?

P.S. What I found equally odd was that the son repeatedly used as an argument (in favour of his mother staying) that he was a Finnish citizen. At the same time he several times stated that he would not follow Finnish laws. ("She leaves over my dead body"; "I will not pay any fine that is imposed on me" etc.)

There seems to be a feeling that citizenship is a one-way street in which you can choose the bits you like and ignore the bits you don't like.

Today's New York Times web site includes a piece on Toyota entitled "Toyota Slows Production in Europe as Sales Lag" and saying it was partly caused by all the recent re-calls.

That prompted me - not before time - to start posting here again with something I noticed in the Finnish press a while ago.

The press guy from Toyota Finland was asked about the re-calls and he said that they were first fixing the cars that were in the showrooms because that was easiest and then when that was done they would (finally - this was already weeks after recalls in the US had gone out) get round to sending out recalls notices to their customers.

My thought immediately was that they don't get it.

Here Toyota were getting slammed in the press for internally boasting about how much money they had saved by delaying recalls in the US by as long as possible (a story at the time) and yet here was the Toyota Finland guy saying that there first priority was to save *Toyota Finland's* money by first fixing cars that no-one was driving and only later fixing the cars of that Toyota owners *were* driving.

Some people never learn.

Well I do (sometimes). No over-priced Toyotas for me when I change my car. No point in paying extra for a solid car that won't break down if it does.

It's a bit embarassing that this quote is from September 25th 2008.

"When I started this on-and-off series about my impressions of my stay about halfway up Finland, I thought it would be about slow drivers (done that one); cheap houses (started that one - needs to be continued) and the fact that there aren't department stores (to come)."

Time has gone by and anyone waiting for the department store story will still be waiting - or more likely wil have given up long ago.

So let's go back to two weeks in Kokkola in North-West Finland where there are no department stores (well nothing worthy of the name as there is neither a Sokos (or a Sokos in disguise like Wiklund in Turku) or a Stockmann).

The fact that you could buy a nice detached house with a reasonable garden within easy access of the town centre was something that led to the idea of moving there or somewhere like it to live.

But then there was the comment from my wife that it's too far away from a Stockmann department store. (There's one in Oulu which is about a two hour train ride away).

My first thought was to think, so what? But then I was informed that as all the small stores had gone out of business everywhere, the only place to find certain things was in the main Stockmann department store in Helsinki. Oulu might be OK because they could order stuff from the main branch but Stockmann was essential or life couldn't go on.

The above is exaggerating of course but the main thrust of the argument that some things weren't available in Finland outside department stores became clear when we wanted to buy a simple wind-up timer for the kitchen.

All the large malls with their modern shops - if they had such a mondane thing at all - had only completely useless and very expensive designer items that probably wouldn't work and if they did wouldn't ring enough to wake anyone up.

Sokos however (even Stockman had only designer models - a sign of the times as this was last year before they started going down market again to cope with the economic situation) had a wide selection of perfectly normal ones including even one that rang loud enough to hear and wasn't shaped like Santa.

However for me the main clincher wasn't that at all.

When in Kokkola we were in a summer house and it was cold and rainy, so of course you read a lot.

In Stockman and in Akadeeminen Kirjakauppa that belongs to it and is located where it is, they have a wide selection of both Finnish and foreign magazines and daily newspapers (typically one day late except (again) in Helsinki where you can get many on the day of publication).

In Kokkola they were hard put even to provide the Swedish language daiy newspaper for the area that covered Kokkola. So if the local library didn't have it (and to be fair the Kokkola library did have Der Spiegel) reading material in foreign languages just wasn't possible.

THAT for me was the clincher. No foreign papers/magazines; no Kokkola. Because you see moving to Kokkola was for when we were both retired (and thus had time to wander through the racks and look for a good magazine, plus time to read it).

So that made two of us. No Stockmann - no Kokkola.

P.S. Yes I know you can subscribe to the foreign magazines, but where's the fun in that? The fun is deciding whether today to go wild and buy a copy of El Pais you can hardly understand or a copy of Focus (in German) that you can understand all too well or even whether to be tempted into a two week old copy of Private Eye. *That's* why you need a department store.

There was an example in the Finnish press recently of how Finnish politicians don't think of the consequences of their actions when making decisions.

For many years the Finnish-speaking part of the population (and especially those people in the areas where there were few or no Swedish-speaking Finns) were up in arms against the fact that in order to finish school sucessfully one of the compulsary subjects that you needed to pass was Swedish (in Swedish-speaking schools this was Finnish but there was no fight against that).

This was know as "compulsary (forced) Swedish" and for many years the political party representing the Swedish-speaking Finns (which was always part of coalition governments) managed to block any changes to the rules, but finally there came the time when the boss of that party seemed to some onlookers to be more interested in being a minister (with a minister's salary and perks) than to threaten to pull his party out of the coalition on any issue and so Swedish became an optional subject for school completion - with the result that a lot of the students either didn't take the subject or if they did didn't much bother about it with obvious results in their level of competency.

That however was not the "consequences of their actions" that I mentioned above.

The consequences I meant were caused by those same politicians not at the same time changing the rules for graduation from University. It turns out that there too there was (and IS) a requirement to pass a Swedish competency exam (or however else they prove competency here) before graduating.

This has led to some Universities taking an all too lenient view of what competency means in order to graduate their students anyway, whereas in other universities students, who are now forced by Europe-wide changes into not being able to stay at University for ever, aren't able to graduate despite being wizzes in their actual study subject.

In order to avoid these problems the Universities were forced to establish special courses for studying Swedish.

The Universities then discovered that things were so bad that many students didn't even reach the level of competence needed to attend those courses and so they set up special preparatory courses that students could take in order to achieve the basic level of competence in Swedish required to take part in the real course.

While writing about this earlier this week, Huvudstadsbladet then noted that in at least one University some students' level of swedish competence was so low that they didn't even fulfil the requirements for the prepatory course for the course for students with poor Swedish.

So they set up a preparatory course for the preparatory course for the course !

Something for Private Eye, perhaps?

 

The Finnish press has been amusing itself at the expense of the young (32 when made party leader), blond, reasonably good-looking, newish leader of the social democratic party, Jutta Urpilainen.

The reason is that in the television broadcast of the local authority elections she answered every single interview question with the same hackneyed phrase that "First I would like to thank the people who worked on behalf of the party and all our voters" (something roughly like that but even longer!) before going on to put some spin on what actually for her party was a bit of a disaster.

(Vote percentage for that party down by several percentage points compared to the previous local authority elections, yet (spin) second largest party (just!) whereas they were the third largest party in the previous general election [held after the previous local authority elections].)

Said once the phrase was of course OK, but repeated every single time it quickly became less OK.

Various people have put up edited "highlights" from that broadcast on You Tube all of which consist of a slightly different question to a slightly different constellation of people and her identical starter phrase.

Finnish newspapers were not slow to pick this up (very soon over a quarter of a million people (out of a country of 5+ million) had seen the You Tube extracts) and the comment of one person to one such set of extracts that now Finland has it's own Sarah Palin.

However the best comment I read was from a Finnish humourist this weekend. It went something like this ...

"They say that blondes can only remember one thing at a time. This is nonsense. Blondes can remember many things at a time - provided they are the same thing".

... and with that I think I'll leave you ...

P.S. The Finnish elections were covered on one channel in the Swedish language and they naturally also interviewed the party leaders.

I didn't watch that channel on the night but YouTube also has a question being put to Jutta Urpilainen in Swedish and her responding in (extremely heavily accented) Swedish that "First I would like to thank the people who worked on behalf of the party and all our voters" !

P.P.S. One of the YouTube Finnish language pieces has the title "Jutta Urpilainen, part 2". In it she has changed her reply. It now goes "As I said before, first I would like to thank the people who worked on behalf of the party and all our voters"!

The prime minister returned from the economic summit in Paris to say that agreement had been reached that there would NOT be a common EU fund to bail-out banks in EU member countries.

(This was said to be because Germany, in effect, applied its veto to the idea. German sources said this was because Germany would have been expected to fork up about half the money ...)

Anyway back to Finland, the prime minister was happy about this lack of a common fund because there was no reason for Finland to support countries whose banks were in a mess when ours weren't. (I don't think he actually said "when our's aren't" but that was certainly what he meant).

Well we'll see in time if our banks aren't in any trouble. (I personally think most of them learned from the previous Finnish (and Swedish) banking problems in the early 90's not to lend quite too much money for house purchases so they may well be OK).  However this is quite a strange attitude to take for a country that is always among the first to implement even completely mad EU directives.

Especially perhaps when you consider that a lot of politicians are for NATO membership. Now why we shouldn't provide money for a fund to help other EU countries (and possibly ourselves) but should provide money and forces to help the US fight their wars (Those politicians seem to have forgotten that the head General in NATO has always been an American - which if this is supposed to be a democratic alliance is a farce after over 50 years) is beyond me.

I lived for eighteen months in Poland in communist times and soon got used to the fact that the local Polish staff in the office used to take any opportunity to celebrate anything (like name days) that gave them an excuse to go to the cake shop (yes, there were expensive cake shops in communist Warsaw) and buy a cake to bring to work. They also were careful to inform us that when it was our own name days (and of course birthdays) that they expected us to do likewise.

Now of course I live in Finland and there they celebrate officially (with the same kind of heavily creamy cake every time - ordered from the official supplier) with a rather more formal do when someone turns 50 or 60 (or leaves) and that's about it.

Well my first ever full book (on a computing subject) has just been published and I've just received my own copy of it so I thought this would give me the chance to buy some (cheaper but better than that official one) cakes and invite some old and new colleagues for coffee (bring your own) and cakes to "celebrate" that event.

Maybe it was the word "celebrate" that was wrong, but my wife (my key arbitrar in Finnish behaviour) soon put me off that idea. "You can't do that. People will think you are boasting. We Finns don't like people who show off".

So that idea was off but I'd earlier had the idea of having the same cakes (and coffee) when I reach 40 years in the computer industry (yes, it's possible even though computers were a bit bigger and just a triffle more expensive in those days) in November, so I asked her about that.

"Oh, that would be OK. You could have a copy of the book with you then."

So THEN it's OK, but not if the coffee/cakes are because I made the effort to write the darn thing.

Sometimes I don't understand the people here. (Quite often if the truth be told).